GRID Β· FIELD GUIDE
How LNG Moves Gas Around the World β Import, Export, and the Plants That Flipped
Natural gas normally moves through pipelines β but pipelines can't cross an ocean. So how does gas get from a country with a surplus to one across the sea that needs it, what's the difference between a terminal that ships gas out and one that takes it in, and why did several American terminals get built to import gas and then rebuilt to export it instead?
Natural gas is the one major fuel that's awkward to move. Coal and oil are dense and easy to ship; electricity runs down a wire. But gas is bulky and diffuse, and the cheapest way to move it β a pipeline β is also the most rigid: it ties one fixed supplier to one fixed buyer, and it can't cross a wide ocean. LNG is the workaround. By chilling gas into a liquid, you can pour it into a ship and send it anywhere there's a coast, and this layer maps the coastal terminals where that trade begins and ends.
Switch it on and the shape of the global gas market appears. A scatter of ember-orange tanks marks where gas is liquefied and shipped out β concentrated in the few places with gas to sell, like the Gulf, Australia and the US Gulf Coast. A far larger spread of ice-cyan tanks marks where it's received β ringing the coasts of Europe and Asia, the big buyers. The trade flows from the orange to the cyan, across the oceans the pipelines can't cross.
The map is drawn from Wikidata's catalogue of terminals, and it's honest about two limits. It colours terminals by type rather than sizing them, because the source carries no capacity figure β so this shows you where and which kind, not how big. And its coverage follows what Wikidata has catalogued, which under-represents East Asia's big importers: Japan, South Korea and China have more terminals in reality than appear here. What it does show cleanly is the structure of the trade β the two ends, and the seaborne bridge between them.
Frequently asked questions
What is an LNG terminal?
LNG stands for liquefied natural gas. Natural gas is normally moved through pipelines, but a pipeline can't cross a wide ocean β so to ship gas by sea, you first turn it into a liquid. Chilled to about β162 Β°C, natural gas condenses into a liquid that takes up roughly 1/600th of its gaseous volume, cold and compact enough to load into the insulated tanks of a special tanker ship. An LNG terminal is the place on the coast where that happens: either an export terminal that chills and loads the gas, or an import terminal that receives the tankers and turns the liquid back into gas. This map plots 128 of these terminals worldwide, drawn as storage tanks and coloured by which job they do.
What's the difference between an import and an export terminal?
They're the two ends of the same journey. An export terminal does liquefaction: it takes gas from a pipeline, purifies and chills it until it's a liquid, and loads it onto tankers. These are expensive, energy-hungry plants, and they're built where there's gas to sell β Qatar, Australia, the United States, Algeria. An import terminal does regasification: it receives the tankers, stores the cold liquid, and warms it back into gas to feed into the local pipeline network. These are simpler and far more numerous, built wherever a country buys gas by sea β across Europe, Japan, South Korea, China, India. On the map, ember-orange tanks are export (liquefaction) terminals, ice-cyan tanks are import (regasification) terminals, and lilac tanks do both.
Why were some US terminals built to import and then switched to export?
It's one of the sharpest reversals in modern energy. In the 2000s the United States expected to run short of gas, so companies built import terminals β Sabine Pass, Freeport, Cameron, Cove Point β to receive LNG from abroad. Then the shale boom hit: hydraulic fracturing unlocked enormous domestic gas reserves, and almost overnight the US went from a country bracing to import gas to one with a surplus to sell. Rather than abandon those brand-new import terminals, operators added liquefaction trains and re-tooled them to export the same gas they'd planned to receive. That's why a small 'both' category exists on this map: terminals built for one direction of the trade, rebuilt for the other.
Why does this map colour the terminals instead of sizing them?
Honesty about the data. On the wind and solar layers, every site is sized by its capacity in megawatts, because that figure is recorded. For LNG terminals there is no throughput or capacity figure in the underlying data (Wikidata) at all. Rather than invent a size β guessing, or drawing every tank identically and implying they're all the same β this map does what the pipelines layer does: it leaves size out and lets a thing that IS well recorded carry the story. Here that's the terminal's type (import, export, or both), shown as colour. So the map answers 'where is gas shipped from, and where is it received?' faithfully, without faking a 'how big?' it can't actually answer.
How do LNG terminals tie into the pipelines?
They're the sea-crossing link in a mostly land-based system. Gas reaches an export terminal through a pipeline, gets liquefied and shipped, and then β at an import terminal on the far side β is turned back into gas and fed into that country's pipeline network to reach power plants, factories and homes. LNG is what lets the global gas trade jump the gaps that pipelines can't bridge: between continents, across oceans, or to countries that don't trust a fixed pipeline link to a single supplier. Switch on the Pipelines layer alongside this one and you can see both halves of how gas moves β the fixed overland arteries, and the flexible seaborne bridges that connect them.
SEE IT LIVE
Everything in this guide is on the live map β explore the worldβs data centres for yourself.